![]() |
|||
Volume. XIX, No. 47 From the pastors heart: Christian rockHaving written a few articles about CCM, I am compelled to write something about Christian rock again. I have mentioned about Christian rock before. However, one of my friends told me that he had listened to Christian rock and did not know why it was not good to listen to it. I want to share some of my studies with him. I must begin with the definition of rock music from Virginia Tech Multimedia Music Dictionary: “Popular music of the late 20th century, especially among the younger population. Rock music originated in the 1950's in America, but swiftly became popular in Europe and throughout the world. In the late sixties and seventies, many British rock composers and performers became popular in the United States as well as in Europe. This style of music is characterized by a driving backbeat, electric guitar, and vocals. Rock music has been associated in the past with youth rebellion and protesting, but has developed into a more accepted form of entertainment among most age groups.” (http://www.music.vt.edu/musicdictionary/). From this definition of rock music, we must recognize the origin of this music. The reason that this style of music has been accepted more today than before is not because this music style has been changed, but the society as a whole has been changed. Since its inception, rock music is not fit for worship music. Rock music is often lacking of melody. We have studied that melody, rhythm and harmony are three important components of music. Especially, melody is the most important part of music. Melody consists of horizontal arrangement of notes. Aaron Copland, who is regarded as the dean of American composers, makes this observation about a good melody: “Why a good melody should have the power to move us has thus far defied all analysis . . . Though we may not be able to define what a good melody is in advance, we certainly can make some generalizations about melodies that we already know to be good” (What to Listen for Music, New York, 1957, 40). He also spoke about a few characteristics of a good melody: (1) “It must have rise and fall (i.e., pitches going up and down). A melody that remains static (on the same pitch) can through repetition produce a hypnotic effect.” (2) “It must have satisfying proportions (i. e., a beginning, middle, and ending) and give a sense of completeness. The melody tells the story of the piece.” (3) “It must at some point (usually near the end) come to a climax and then a resolution. All good art will have a climax.” (4) “It will be written in such a way to elicit an emotional response by the listener” (Ibid., p. 46). Rock music lacks several of these essential characteristics of good music. Rock music has beats on different places. As we know, rhythm makes the music go. Music without rhythm becomes continuous and boring sound. Rhythm makes music move through time by orderly manner. As the heartbeat is the life of the body, rhythm is the life of music. In any good music, there is good rhythm, too. In any good music, the strongest beat falls on the first, and the second strongest on the third. Thus, it becomes ONE, Two, THREE, Four. However, rock music often reverses this common order by emphasizing on the offbeat (syncopation). Thus, it becomes One, TWO, Three, FOUR. Rock music has too much emphasis on beat. The fundamental problem with rock music is its relentless beat which dominates the music and produces an hypnotic effect. Bob Larson points out that "the major issue for consideration from a moral and spiritual standpoint is the extent to which a pulsated or syncopated beat overrides the other musical elements in a song so that the level of communication is primarily sexual and physically arousing" (The Day Music Died, Carol Stream, IL, 1972, 15). Tim Fisher explains good music in the following way: “the correct order is a good melody, supported by balanced harmony, undergirded with a firm and consistent rhythm. Concert music (i. e., a symphony or another instrumental piece of music) will sometimes vary from this order because of a desire to showcase the talents of the composer or the dexterity of the performer. However, our topic here is Christian music as it relates to communicating the spoken word. If you desire to communicate a text with music, the order is clear: melody, harmony, then rhythm” (Battle for Christian Music, Greenville, SC, 1992, 68).” The following comment from Bob Larson will help us understand the role of rhythm in rock music: “Unlike other forms of music which may reveal melodic inventiveness, the focus of rock is usually on the beat. It is a drummer’s holiday. . . . Jazz has a rhythmic swing. It flows with an exciting yet ultimately releasing feeling. But rock is built from a hard, straight-up-and-down pounding rhythm that produces frustrated energy. Some rock sounds emphasize alternating beats, while other rock tunes in part or whole hammer every beat home. Though he may add fills (short percussion outburst), it is the drummer’s job to keep the force of rock moving with the incessant pulsating and syncopated beat” (The Day Music Died, 16). Rock is full of beat. Quentin Schultze notes: "The heart of rock and roll
is rhythm and beat–those twin forces give rock its energy and propel its
intentional simple harmony and melody. The appeal does not lie in harmony, because
most rock and roll music consists of no more than four or five very simple cords
in a very clearly defined key. Nor does the attraction lie in melody, since
the rock and roll vocalist does not so much sing as shout and wail” (Dancing
in the Dark, Grand Rapids,MI, 1991, 151). Daniel and Bernadette Skubik said in Neurophysiology of Rock, which was published
separately as an appendix in John Blanchard, Pop Goes the Gospel: Rock in the
Church (Durham, England, 1991, 191): “The conclusion of these studies
is twofold. First, lyrics are of minor importance here. Whether the words are
evil, innocuous, or based in Holy Scripture, the overall neurophysiological
effects generated by rock music remain the same. There is simply no such thing
as Christian rock that is substantively different in its impact. Second, short-term
implications involve a decrease in receptivity in discursive communication,
while long-term implications pose serious questions for rehabilitation of degraded
left-hemisphere cognitive skills. In less technical jargon and in specific context,
we should expect that abilities to receive and deliver the gospel, to pray discursively,
and to study Scripture are compromised [by rock music].” Will you listen
to rock music continually? Lovingly, Your pastor |
|